Harrison v. Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Veolia was not a governmental entity or political subdivision for purposes of ITCA
• holding that Veolia was not a governmental entity or political subdivision for purposes of ITCA
• explaining that the notice provision is designed “to permit prompt investigation of claims” and “one of the main concerns [the Indiana Tort Claims Act] intended to address clearly was protection of the public treasury”
• explaining that the notice provision is designed \to permit prompt investigation of claims\ and \one of the main concerns [the Indiana Tort Claims Act] intended to address clearly was protection of the public treasury\
• “In response to Campbell [259 Ind. 55, 284 N.E.2d 733 (1972) ], the General Assembly enacted [the] ITCA in 1974”
• “In response to Campbell [259 Ind. 55, 284 N.E.2d 733 (1972)], the General Assembly enacted [the] ITCA in 1974.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).