Skip to main content

Harrison v. State

Citations

  • 382 N.E.2d 920
  • 269 Ind. 677
  • 1978 Ind. LEXIS 848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a prosecutor’s comment to a defendant that his cooperation “could be of benefit to him, but not necessarily” was vague and ambiguous and did not render the confession involuntary
  • finding no fault with an abandonment instruction that read, in part: “When two or more persons combine to commit a crime, each is criminally responsible for the acts of his confederates committed in furtherance of the common design, the act of each being the act of all.”
  • commentary by the Indiana Law Study Commission noting that the newly enacted statute is consistent with the law as set out in Hedrick
  • corpus delicti was established by independent evidence that the homicide was violent and was criminal in nature — the State was not required to establish, independent of the confession, the exact felony underlying the felony murder charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pivarnik, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.