Skip to main content

Harrison v. State

Citations

  • 241 S.W.3d 23
  • 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1226
  • 2007 WL 2781653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing prosecution to rebut character evidence—introduced by defense witness who testified that defendant was “good” and “sweet” person—with evidence of defendant’s prior assault convictions and citations
  • explaining that cases decided before the Texas Rules of Evidence were adopted do not address the proper application of the current rules of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.