Harrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that putting implied restrictions on an employment-at-will contract would be inconsistent with the express terms of the contract which allowed for termination at any time
• holding that putting implied restrictions on an employment-at-will contract would be inconsistent with the express terms of the contract which allowed for termination at any time
• holding that contract did not incorporate provisions of employee manual where contract contained no language indicating that contract was “subject to” provisions of manual
• rejecting cause of action for breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing in at-will employment setting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).