Harrison v. Persighetti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court’s denial of motion to suppress, which was based on merits of the challenge, was affirmed by court of appeals on account of appellants’ lack of standing, “a matter not discussed in the parties’ briefs”
• trial court's denial of motion to suppress, which was based on merits of the challenge, was affirmed by court of appeals on account of appellants' lack of standing, \a matter not discussed in the parties' briefs\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).