Harrison v. Harrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a lower court's ruling is presumed to be \correct unless the appellant provides the appellate court with a record that is sufficient to evaluate the appellant's contentions of error.\
• a lower court’s ruling is presumed to be “correct unless the appellant provides the appellate court with a record that is sufficient to evaluate the appellant’s contentions of error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• N & D HOLDING, INC. v. Town of Davie
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-19· cited 6×
• Banks v. Banks
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-24· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• 5-H CORP. v. Padovano
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-11-25· cited 27×
• Beasley v. Beasley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-21· cited 12×
• Kirchinger v. Kirchinger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-05· cited 5×