Harrison v. Harrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding periodic-alimony obligation was not modifiable because the parties specified in their settlement agreement that the periodic-alimony obligation was to remain contractual and, expressly, was not to be merged into the divorce judgment
• holding periodic-alimony obligation was not modifiable because the parties specified in their settlement agreement that the periodic-alimony obligation was to remain contractual and, expressly, was not to be merged into the divorce judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Murphy
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2003-12-30· cited 11×
• Adkins v. Adkins
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2010-01-22· cited 6×
• Harrison v. Harrison
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1987-10-02· cited 1×
• Murphy v. Murphy Benvenuto
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2003-06-20· cited 1×
• Bridges Barkley Crawford v. Andrew Martin Crawford
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2026-06-26

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Oliver v. Oliver
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1983-01-26· cited 33×
• Block v. Block
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1967-06-22· cited 25×
• East v. East
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1980-12-17· cited 20×