Harrison v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the evidence was sufficient to establish that Harrison either committed the robbery himself or acted in concert with Pollard in its commission, and hence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury”
• excise tax on fuel distinguished from business license tax
• excise tax on fuel distinguished from business license tax

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1984-03-09· cited 66×
• State of W. Va. v. Fitch
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-03-11· cited 4×
• Dearing Beverage Co. v. City of Winchester
  Winchester County Circuit Court· 1994-03-18
• Vaughn Realty of Front Royal, Inc. v. Town of Front Royal
  Warren County Circuit Court· 1992-09-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Foster v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1942-01-19· cited 88×
• Ward v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1964-10-12· cited 62×
• Spradlin v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1954-01-25· cited 48×
• Boggs v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1929-09-19· cited 25×