Harrison v. Banque Indosuez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment when plaintiff provided no evidence that she detrimentally relied upon a purported termination limitation when she accepted employment
• dismissing the official capacity Title VII claims against a senior bank officer and supervisor
• at-will relationship was not altered by comment that “[w]e look forward to a long and mutually rewarding association”
• “While plaintiff may have believed that her agreement entitled her to a position until age 65, there is nothing contained in the agreement to indicate any term of definite duration.”
• supervisory employees may not be held individually liable under the ADA
• “The Second Circuit has not addressed whether employees may be held personally liable under the ADA; however, as Title VII and the ADA define “employer” identically, the Court’s holding in (Tomka v. Seiler Corp., 66 F.3d 1295, 1317 (2d Cir.1995)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).