Harrison Sheet Steel Co. v. Lyons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• class action was proper where the defendant refused to refund illegal occupation taxes collected from its customers
• class action was proper where the defendant refused to refund illegal occupation taxes collected from its customers
• “Where it appears that the common issue is dominant and pervasive, something more than the assertion of hypothetical variations of a minor character should be required to bar the action.”
• “Where it appears that the common issue is dominant and pervasive, something more than the assertion of hypothetical variations of a minor character should be required to bar the action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).