Skip to main content
· 6/16/2020

Harrison, K. v. Health Network Lab, Aplts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding prosecutor violated defendant’s constitutional right to refuse by arguing at trial that defendant’s refusal to submit to a warrantless DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) swab showed his guilt regarding the charged rape
  • holding prosecutor violated defendant's constitutional right to refuse by arguing at trial that defendant's refusal to submit to a warrantless DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) swab showed his guilt regarding the charged rape
  • finding \manifest constitutional error\ where the prosecutor argued in her closing that the defendant refused to provide a DNA sample because he was guilty
  • finding \manifest constitutional error\ where the prosecutor argued in her closing that the defendant refused to provide a DNA sample because he was guilty
  • finding \manifest constitutional error\ where the prosecutor argued in her closing that the defendant refused to provide a DNA sample because he was guilty
  • prosecutor’s statement that refusing DNA search was consistent with guilt impermissible violation of constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.