Harrison E. Salisbury v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “bare discussions by this court and the Congress of NSA’s methods generally cannot be equated with disclosure by the [NSA] itself of its methods of information gathering”
• discussing FOIA requested information in Senate report did not 24 waive privilege asserted by National Security Administration
• disclosure of documentation of NSA’s interception of foreign communications would jeopardize efficacy of its intelligence collection methods
• \[B]are discussions by this court and the Congress of NSA's methods generally cannot be equated with disclosure by the agency itself of its methods of information gathering.\
• “[B]are discussions by this court and the Congress of NSA’s methods generally cannot be equated with disclosure by the agency itself of its methods of information gathering.”
• “[B]are discussions by this court and the Congress of [the National Security Agency’s] methods generally cannot be equated with disclosure by the agency itself of its methods of information gathering”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).