Skip to main content
· 8/23/1993

Harriscom Svenska, Ab v. Harris Corporation and R.F. Systems, a Division of R.F. Communications Group of Harris Corporation

Citations

  • 3 F.3d 576
  • 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 665
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that 8 1 when defendant was excused from performance by force majeure, defendant was 2 not required to “provide substitute performance.”
  • ‘‘[l]ike commercial impracticability, a force majeure clause in a contract excuses nonperformance when circum- stances beyond the control of the parties prevent performance’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumbard, Cardamone, McLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.