· 12/6/2011
Harris v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Citations
- 832 F. Supp. 2d 873
- 2011 WL 6076331
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140178
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “a district court should adopt the findings . . . of the magistrate judge to which no specific objection is filed,” referencing Arn
- “a district court should adopt the findings . . . of the magistrate judge to which no specific objection is filed,” referencing Arn
- “a district court should adopt the findings . . . of the magistrate judge to which no specific objection is filed,” referencing Arn
- “a district court should adopt the findings . . . of the magistrate judge to which no specific objection is filed,” referencing Arn
- “a district court should adopt the findings . . . of the magistrate judge to which no specific objection is filed,” referencing Arn
- “a district court should adopt the findings . . . of the magistrate judge to which no specific objection is filed,” referencing Arn
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Black, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.