Harris v. Toys\ R\ Us-Penn, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[w]e have repeatedly held that failure to develop an argument with citation to, and analysis of, relevant authority waives that issue on review”
• stating that an appellant’s failure to develop an argument with analysis of relevant authority waives that issue on review
• finding waiver for failure to develop argument with citation to relevant authority
• failure to develop an argument with citation to, and analysis of, relevant authority waives that issue on review
• “Beyond an approximate height and a characterization of the speaker as thin, Appellant provided no information about the declarant.”
• “We have repeatedly held that failure to develop an argument with citation to, and analysis of, relevant authority waives that issue on review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).