Skip to main content

HARRIS v. the STATE.

Citations

  • 812 S.E.2d 342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim premised upon counsel’s “short” opening and closing argument that did not explain basic principles of law
  • “[T]he fact that another attorney might have made a different closing argument does not show ineffectiveness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andrews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.