Harris v. Taliaferro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Dr. Rosenzweig’s specific causation testimony is not excluded under Daubert because he “adequately considered and eliminated alternate causes” of the plaintiffs symptoms after reviewing her medical records
• concluding that “Dr. Shobeiri’s report is not necessarily crucial to the plaintiffs ability to be heard on the merits of her case” because another expert is available to opine on specific causation
• describing “reliable pathology methods—he reviewed slides, considered the possible causes [], and came to a diagnostic conclusion”
• finding expert who “participated in the development of mesh products” qualified to discuss design procedure
• finding expert who “participated in the development of mesh products” qualified to discuss design procedure
• finding a physician’s opinion that a device is safe and effective is reliable where it was based on his clinical experience and review of scientific literature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).