Harris v. State
Citations
- 96 Miss. 379
- 50 So. 626
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Law and Procedure. Assault and battery with, intent to-murder. Improper argument. Defendant’s failure to testify.</p> <p>In a prosecution for shooting with, intent to kill and murder, a. statement in argument to the jury by the district attorney that the defendant had killed a white man in the house where he did' the shooting which he did not deny, was a direct comment upon, the accused’s failure to testify, and reversible error</p> <p>2. Same. Same. Race prejudice.</p> <p>An inflammatory appeal to race prejudice by the state’s attorney-in his closing argument to the jury, prosecuting a negro for an-assault and battery with intent to kill a white man, requires the reversal of a conviction, where the defendant’s objections to- • the argument were overruled by the trial court and exceptions, duly reserved.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant did not explain away state's incriminating evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Livingston v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 95×
- Monroe v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-09-09· cited 60×
- Wright v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-04-05· cited 35×
- Peterson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1978-03-29· cited 29×
- Hardaway v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1911-03-15· cited 12×
- Henry v. CollinsMississippi Supreme Court· 1963-12-02· cited 11×
- Willie Joe Wright v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2005-05-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.