Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 878 N.E.2d 534
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 2994
  • 2007 WL 4573388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that officer’s pat-down search and removal of object was permissible under Terry where defendant had told officer he had a pocket knife; officer “needed to ensure he removed all potentially dangerous items”
  • holding that search of interior of pill bottle found during pat-down for weapons was beyond scope of Terry because illicit nature of its contents was discovered only after opening it and shining a light inside
  • holding removal of a pill bottle during pat- down search for weapons was proper
  • “In order to preserve officer safety, police may remove an item whose identity is not immediately discernable by touch and that might be used as a weapon.”
  • Terry does not provide justification for looking inside a closed pill bottle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.