Harris v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding issue of the suffi-. ciency of corroborating testimony of accomplice was waived where the requirement of corroboration was not raised to the trial court
• holding issue of the sufficiency of corroborating testimony of accomplice was waived where the requirement of corroboration was not raised to the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hall v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-05-29· cited 41×
• State v. Broadway
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-06-09· cited 37×
• State v. Martinez
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-07-15· cited 31×
• Johnny Franklin Harris v. Vernon Housewright, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
  Eighth Circuit· 1982-12-28· cited 28×
• Ruiz v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1983-07-18· cited 28×
• James v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1983-10-10· cited 21×
• Bishop v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-01-19· cited 20×
• Coleman v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-03-23· cited 19×
• Cook v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2002-03-20· cited 16×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-09-28· cited 16×
• Sargent v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1981-04-20· cited 14×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1983-12-21· cited 10×
• Janes v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1985-03-25· cited 9×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1982-12-22· cited 6×
• Boyd v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1984-12-12· cited 5×
• Maynard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1987-04-22· cited 5×
• Ballew v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1987-06-17· cited 1×
• Anhalt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2000-04-05