Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 225 S.E.2d 263
  • 236 Ga. 766
  • 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The case against [the defendant] is circumstantial as neither robbery victim could positively identify him.”
  • “While the verdict of guilty was not demanded, it was not necessary for the [S]tate to prove that it was impossible for the offense to have been committed by anybody else, or that it might not, by bare possibility, have been done by another.” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ingram

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.