Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 567 S.E.2d 394
  • 256 Ga. App. 120
  • 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 1958
  • 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 854

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[W]e have repeatedly held that it is not the function of this court to cull the record on behalf of a party.\ (punctuation omitted)
  • “[W]e have repeatedly held that it is not the function of this court to cull the record on behalf of a party.” (punctuation omitted)
  • “We have repeatedly held that it is not the function of this [C]ourt to cull the record on behalf of a party. This is particularly true in a case such as this where the transcript alone exceeds 1,500 pages.”
  • “We have repeatedly held that it is not the function of this [C]ourt to cull the record on behalf of a party. This is particularly true in a case such as this where the transcript alone exceeds 1,500 pages.” (footnote and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikell, Andrews, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.