Harris v. Searcy Fed. Savings & Loan Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming court’s conclusion that plaintiff had not exercised the greatest possible diligence when, more than seven weeks after she became aware that there was a problem with service, and after the statute of limitation expired, defendant still had not been served

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).