Harris v. Schuylkill River East Side R. R.
Citations
- 159 Pa. 468
- 28 A. 296
- 1894 Pa. LEXIS 869
Syllabus
<p>Railroads — Eminent domain— Bond— Condemnation proceedings — Assumpsit — Judgment.</p> <p>An action of assumpsit cannot be sustained upon a right of way bond where it appears from the statement filed in the case that judgment had been obtained against the railroad company for damages, although the statement avers that such judgment was improperly and fraudulently procured under an alleged agreement of the parties without trial or submission of evidence.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating prima facie case under PHRA is established by showing that complainant is member of protected class, has suffered adverse employment action, and others not in the class have been treated differently
- stating prima facie case under PHRA is established by showing that complainant is member of protected class, has suffered adverse employment action, and others not in the class have been treated differently
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.