Harris v. Reeves

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rule 24(a)(1) provides that intervention of right exists when a statute of the United States confers an unconditional right to intervene but the rule does not provide for intervention of right when a state statute confers an unconditional right to intervene.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Harris v. City of Philadelphia
  Third Circuit· 1995-02-15· cited 177×
• Kevin Cooper v. Gavin Newsom
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-09-16· cited 32×
• Klamath Irrigation District v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-02-28· cited 23×
• In re Safeguard Scientifics
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2004-02-13· cited 14×
• United States v. Union Electric Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 1995-08-30· cited 6×
• National Labor Relations Board v. Frazier
  D. New Jersey· 1992-11-09· cited 6×
• Riley v. Simmons
  D. New Jersey· 1993-12-13· cited 4×
• Harris v. Reeves
  Third Circuit· 1991-10-31
• Gallick v. Barto
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-08-06