Harris v. Pameco Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the trial court record and declaring that we were “not persuaded by the trial court’s analysis”
• an employer who has 5 By administrative rule, OAR 839-005-0030, BOLI has adopted a negli- gence standard of liability similar to the federal standard: “(5
• “A plaintiff seeking to establish a prima facie case of retaliation under ORS 659A.030(l)(f) must establish the same elements as are required under Title VII.”
• “That is so even though one of the effects of the denial of tenure—the eventual loss of a teaching position—did not occur until later.”
• an employer who has knowledge of harassing behavior and takes immediate remedial action is not liable under ORS 659A.030
• “[W]e may consider the existence of a special relationship, including an employer and employee relationship, between the parties in determining the bounds of socially tolerable conduct.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).