· 9/28/1989
Harris v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Citations
- 720 F. Supp. 567
- 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 637
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11485
- 53 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,849
- 51 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 644
- 1989 WL 113062
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- motion to dismiss granted because two individuals and one separate corporate entity not named in EEOC complaint were named as defendants in the lawsuit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Turk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.