Harris v. Morris Plan Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that owners could not “avoid the consequences of MCL 500.3113(b) if no owner obtained the required insurance” and that “when none of the owners maintains the requisite coverage, no owner may recover PIP benefits”
• noting that “[t]he [Iqbal Court -6- made it clear that it was addressing the problem of whether the statute required ‘each and every owner’ to maintain insurance on a vehicle.”
• noting that “[t]he [Iqbal Court -6- made it clear that it was addressing the problem of whether the statute required ‘each and every owner’ to maintain insurance on a vehicle.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).