Harris v. Morgan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claim of tortious interference with prospective business relationships requires proof of “defendant’s knowledge of a business relationship between the plaintiff and a third party” (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 766B)
• claim of tortious interference with prospective business relationships requires proof of \defendant's knowledge of a business relationship between the plaintiff and a third party\ (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 766B )
• “[H]orizontal price-fixing schemes are illegal under the antitrust laws ‘only because of the harm they may cause—increased prices—to purchasers’ of the product for which prices have been fixed.” (brackets omitted) (quoting Gatt, 711 F.3d at 77)
• granting defendants summary judgment on duplicative unjust enrichment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).