Harris v. Memorial Hospital (In Re Harris)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that that the creditor’s act of sending two account statements with a detachable portion to send an amount due violated the automatic stay and noting that if the statements did not constitute an act to collect a debt as proscribed by § 362(a)(6
• “When a creditor violates the stay, it must expect that a debtor will take some type of action ... [i]t must also be expected that a debtors’ attorney will take steps to protect their client’s rights ... ”
• violations of automatic stay should not be viewed as “profit-making endeav- or”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).