Skip to main content
· 11/1/2016

Harris v. Maryland

Citations

  • 670 F. App'x 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that testimony that defendant’s representative “solicited investors” failed to establish that defendant “made calls or used other means of interstate commerce”
  • “Courts afford pro se litigants greater latitude than represented parties.” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Niemeyer, Shedd, Traxler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.