Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 3/1/1985

Harris v. Heckler

Citations

  • 756 F.2d 431
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The medical opinions and diagnoses of treating physicians are generally accorded substantial deference, and if the opinions are uncontradicted, complete deference.”
  • “The medical opinions and diagnoses of treating physicians are generally accorded substantial deference, and if the opinions are uncontradicted, complete deference.”
  • “The determination of disability is ultimately the prerogative of the Commissioner, not the treating physician.”
  • “The determination of disability is ultimately the prerogative of the Commissioner, not the treating physician.”
  • “The determination of disability is ultimately the prerogative of the Commissioner, not the treating physician.”
  • “The determination of disability is ultimately the prerogative of the Commissioner, not the treating physician.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weick, Wellford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Harris v. Heckler

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.