Harris v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiffs Massachusetts judgment was entitled to full faith and credit under Connecticut law because it was final judgment
• “The plaintiff, by obtaining both final orders, made the judgment impervious to modification and therefore took the necessary step in entitling her case to full faith and credit under Connecticut law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-03-23· cited 15×
• Collard and Roe, PC v. Klein
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-02-08· cited 13×
• White v. White
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-08-27· cited 10×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barber v. Barber
  Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 184×
• Pemberton v. Pemberton
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1980-01-03· cited 37×
• City of Boston v. Santosuosso
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1941-01-28· cited 34×
• Walzer v. Walzer
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-05-03· cited 25×
• Hendrix v. Hendrix
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-12-01· cited 16×
• Sawyer v. Kuhnle
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1949-03-08· cited 6×