Harris v. Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding an agreement between a physician and a supplement distributor void as against public policy because it involved illegal kickbacks and fee- splitting in violation of the Patient Self-Referral Act; no arbitration clause was at issue
• “A contract which violates a provision of the constitution[,] or a statute is void and illegal and, will not be enforced in our courts.”
• “A contract which violates a provision of the constitution or a statute is void and illegal, and, will not be enforced in our courts.”
• where a contract is void as violative of Florida law, it “confers no enforceable rights on appellants based upon it”
• where a contract is void as violative of Florida law, it \confers no enforceable rights on appellants based upon it\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).