Skip to main content
· 10/7/1996

Harris v. Gillis

Citations

  • 519 U.S. 847
  • 117 S. Ct. 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • qualified immu nity defense rejected because prisoner’s due process rights in disciplinary proceedings were clearly established even before Wolff
  • inmate in Massachusetts prison had clearly established lib erty interest against being put in isolated confinement without a due process hearing
  • prisoner’s due process right to disciplinary hearing clearly established even before leading case, Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974), decided
  • prisoner’s due process right to disciplinary hearing was clearly established even before leading case, Wolff v: McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974), was decided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.