Skip to main content
· 1/26/1999

Harris v. Ford

Citations

  • 32 F. Supp. 2d 1109
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 658
  • 1999 WL 38233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that 23 defendants were “free” to file a dispositive motion once the court determined that plaintiff 24 had stated a cognizable claim
  • providing, in dicta, that after the complaint passes the screening process and the court orders the complaint served on the defendants, “[i]f defendants then wish to make motion for a more definite statement, or a dispositive motion, they are free to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Singleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.