Skip to main content

Harris v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 313 S.W.3d 40
  • 2010 Ky. LEXIS 110
  • 2010 WL 2016524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s memory of and boasting about killing shortly after committing the crime did not “permit a finding that at the time of the offense [he] was so intoxicated that he did not know what he was doing”
  • “While a trial court would be within its discretion to avoid even ,the possibility of impropriety posed by married jurors by dismissing one or the other, the trial court did not abuse its discretion here [by permitting the married jurors to both serve on the defendant’s jury].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abramson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.