Skip to main content
· 6/19/2007

Harris v. Cochise Health Systems

Citations

  • 160 P.3d 223
  • 215 Ariz. 344
  • 2007 Ariz. App. LEXIS 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellate court has jurisdiction to consider claims involuntarily dismissed before voluntary dismissal of remainder of action
  • explaining why appellate courts generally do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal
  • exercising appellate jurisdiction challenging dismissal of claims asserted in original complaint but not re-asserted in amended complaint, in a subsequent appeal from dismissal of claims in amended complaint
  • affirming dismissal for failure to comply with the notice of claim statute’s requirements
  • “Failure to comply with the statute is not cured by actual notice or substantial compliance.”
  • “[c]ompliance with the notice provision of § 12-821.01(A) is a 22 mandatory and essential prerequisite to such an action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eckerstrom, Brammer, Espinosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.