· 6/19/2007
Harris v. Cochise Health Systems
Citations
- 160 P.3d 223
- 215 Ariz. 344
- 2007 Ariz. App. LEXIS 104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellate court has jurisdiction to consider claims involuntarily dismissed before voluntary dismissal of remainder of action
- explaining why appellate courts generally do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal
- exercising appellate jurisdiction challenging dismissal of claims asserted in original complaint but not re-asserted in amended complaint, in a subsequent appeal from dismissal of claims in amended complaint
- affirming dismissal for failure to comply with the notice of claim statute’s requirements
- “Failure to comply with the statute is not cured by actual notice or substantial compliance.”
- “[c]ompliance with the notice provision of § 12-821.01(A) is a 22 mandatory and essential prerequisite to such an action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eckerstrom, Brammer, Espinosa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.