Indiana Supreme Court· 5/29/1857
Harris v. Bradley
Citations
- 9 Ind. 166
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that the knowledge requirement refers to the element of possession, not to the legal disability
- statute seeking to impose punishment on individuals adjudicated as dangerous and possessing a firearm was not prohibited Bill of Attainder because defendant’s actions were found by jury
- statute seeking to impose punishment on individuals adjudicated as dangerous and possessing a firearm was not prohibited Bill of Attainder because defendant’s actions were found by jury
- statute seeking to impose punishment on individuals adjudicated as dangerous and possessing a firearm was not prohibited Bill of Attainder because defendant’s actions were found by jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.