Harris v. Barkubein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proper admission of other-crimes evidence did not compel defendant to testify to dispel prejudicial effect of that evidence
• proper admission of other-crimes evidence did not compel defendant to testify to dispel prejudicial effect of that evidence
• proper admission of other-crimes evidence did not compel defendant to testify to dispel prejudicial effect of that evidence
• proper admission of other-crimes evidence did not compel defendant to testify to dispel prejudicial effect of that evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).