Harris v. Barcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declaring that, where the evidence established a dog was of championship caliber, the dog was unique chattel and would therefore be the proper subject of specific performance
• declaring that, where the evidence established a dog was of championship caliber, the dog was unique chattel and would therefore be the proper subject of specific performance
• declaring that, where the evidence established a dog was of championship caliber, the dog was unique chattel and would therefore be the proper subject of specific performance
• “[The dog] was, there- fore, a unique chattel and specific performance would be an appropriate remedy for her recovery if an equitable basis for relief could be established.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).