Harris v. Aetna Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]here can hardly be a meaningful dialogue between the claimant and the Plan administrators if evidence is revealed only after a final decision.” (quoting Abram v. Cargill, Inc., 395 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir. 2005))
• \ [P]ost hoc explanations for benefits denials are generally without merit[.]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).