Harris v. Adler School of Professional Psychology

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that nondiscrimination policy “was only a general reference of adherence to existing law concerning discrimination,” not independent contractual obligation
• finding the Adler School’s non-discrimination policy was a statement of adherence to existing law and did not constitute an independent contractual obligation
• finding the Adler School’s non-discrimination policy was a statement of adherence to existing law and did not constitute an independent contractual obligation
• affirming dismissal of contract claim against graduate school for alleged breach of nondiscrimination provisions in school catalog
• “The Adler School’s nondiscrimination policy was a statement of adherence to existing law and did not constitute, and was not, an independent contractual obligation.”
• “The Adler School’s nondiscrimination policy was a statement of adherence to existing law and does not constitute, and was not, an independent contractual obligation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).