HARRIS TRUST BANK OF AZ v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute of limitations began to run when the trustee “violate[d] one or more of his obligations , to the beneficiary or repudiate^] the trust”
• holding that the statute of limitations began to run when the trustee “violate[d] one or more of his obligations to the beneficiary or repudiate[d] the trust”
• holding that the statute of limitations began to run when the trustee “violate[d] one or more of his obligations to the beneficiary or repudiate[d] the trust”
• concluding that “acceptance of special action jurisdiction is in the interests of judicial economy” where “allowing th[e] matter to proceed to trial without addressing the error presented by th[e] petition would ultimately result in reversal”
• addressing the question of whether a particular statute of limitations applied at all, not when it began to run
• addressing the question of whether a particular statute of limitations applied at all, not when it began to run

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).