Skip to main content
· 5/26/2021

Harris, Marty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • opining that “the object of the section was for the protection of domestic creditors”
  • holding statute applied to a claim against a defendant who had permanently moved away from Texas and thus tolled the running of limitations as long as there was some possibility the defendant might return to Texas
  • explaining object of section was for protection of domestic creditors and was intended to protect creditors from inconvenience and loss to which they would be exposed by absence of their debtors and consequent immunity of debtors from process and judgment
  • explaining object of section was for protection of domestic creditors and was intended to protect creditors from inconvenience and loss to which they would be exposed by absence of their debtors and consequent immunity of debtors from 3 process and judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.