Harris County, Texas v. Carmax Auto Superstores Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that □ “a local law enforcement official is bound when his interests are represented by the state attorney general”
• explaining that Rule 65’s “notice requirement necessarily requires that the party opposing the preliminary injunction has the opportunity to be heard and to present evidence”
• county not in privity with or virtually represented by state attorney general
• “[T]he rational basis test ‘is not a toothless one.’”
• “[T]he rational basis test ‘is not a toothless one.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).