Harris County Precinct Four Constable Department v. Grabowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that deputy’s belief that he had reported a violation of law was not reasonable where the violation was simply that of an internal departmental policy
• holding that deputy’s belief that he had reported a violation of law was not reasonable where the violation was simply that of an internal departmental policy
• holding that deputy's belief that he had reported a violation of law was not reasonable where the violation was simply that of an internal departmental policy
• concluding that officer’s belief “that Constable Moore violated the law fails to satisfy the second prong because his belief was not reasonable in light of his experience as a peace officer”
• holding statute did not apply to reported violation of constable = s internal policies
• holding that the officer failed to prove that he had an objective good- faith belief that the constable violated the law because “he presented no evidence of a law he believed [the constable] violated,” and he “openly admitted that he could think of no traffic law violated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).