Skip to main content
· 10/8/1992

Harris Bank Hinsdale, N.A. v. Caliendo

Citations

  • 601 N.E.2d 1330
  • 235 Ill. App. 3d 1013
  • 176 Ill. Dec. 632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • to withstand a motion for summary judgment, the nonmovant “must present some factual basis that arguably may entitle him to judgment”
  • evidence that would be inadmissible at trial is not to be considered in a summary judgment proceeding
  • evidence that would be inadmissible at trial is not to be considered in a summary judgment proceeding
  • “evidence that would be inadmissible at trial may not be considered in support of or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment”
  • where bank filed a motion for summary judgment supported by affidavit, trial court properly disregarded unsworn and uncertified letter attached to and referenced in mortgagor’s affidavit submitted in response
  • “evidence that would be inadmissible at trial may not be considered in support of or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Unverzagt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.