· 10/8/1992
Harris Bank Hinsdale, N.A. v. Caliendo
Citations
- 601 N.E.2d 1330
- 235 Ill. App. 3d 1013
- 176 Ill. Dec. 632
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- to withstand a motion for summary judgment, the nonmovant “must present some factual basis that arguably may entitle him to judgment”
- evidence that would be inadmissible at trial is not to be considered in a summary judgment proceeding
- evidence that would be inadmissible at trial is not to be considered in a summary judgment proceeding
- “evidence that would be inadmissible at trial may not be considered in support of or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment”
- where bank filed a motion for summary judgment supported by affidavit, trial court properly disregarded unsworn and uncertified letter attached to and referenced in mortgagor’s affidavit submitted in response
- “evidence that would be inadmissible at trial may not be considered in support of or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Unverzagt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.