Harrington v. Trotman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that superior court \fundamentally erred as a matter of law in finding unjust enrichment when there was a valid contract between the parties\
• providing that a party “cannot avoid the bargain he made and claim recovery under a theory of unjust enrichment” “when there [i]s a valid contract between the parties”
• “[T]here can be no claim for unjust enrichment when an express contract exists between the parties.”
• homeowner could 17 18 not recover damages against contractor on unjust enrichment theory where parties’ relationship is 19 governed by written agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).