Skip to main content
· 4/26/1988

Harrington v. City of Portland

Citations

  • 708 F. Supp. 1561
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3884
  • 1988 WL 151231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal of actions as moot and referring to their facts in determining whether denial of fees appropriate
  • “Even though Lovell’s [FOIA] suits were mooted by the production of the requested documents, mootness does not automatically preclude an award of attorney’s fees.”
  • “The mere fact that the information sought was not released until after the suit was instituted without more is insufficient to establish that [plaintiff] substantially prevailed in either of his suits.”
  • Thomas A. Clark, Circuit Judge, dissenting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frye

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.